Monday, February 23, 2009

Passion is a beautiful thing


Last night we got together with friends Nancy, Jane, and Nancy's daughter Sarah, her partner Jay, and their friend Zach. Nancy hosted. It was so much fun. Simple appetizers of chips, humus and salsa. Dinner was minestrone and bread. Dessert was my famous brownies. Lots of laughter and friendship. 

What's sticking in my head this morning, however, is Zach's passion. I just met Zach yesterday, but he made such a huge impression on me ~ it's always so powerful to see someone living his passion, and Zach surely is. Six months out of cosmetology school, he brought his blow-dryer, special round brush and pomade with him from the Cities. He's working in a fabulous salon, and he was eager for the chance to show his stuff. Jane got a blow-dry while the rest of us sat around the table drinking wine and chatting. When Zach was done with Jane's hair, she looked blissful from the scalp massage and ready to anchor the evening news. 

And Zach was aglow. That's what's got me still smiling this morning. Passion like that is priceless and contagious. I can't wait to see what this young man will do with his life... stand back 'cuz it will be great.

Pic info: "Amazonas" from Flickr Creative Commons

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Facebook and Privacy: what to make of it?

Post-Note: 3/2/09. I've heard that the new TOS's have been changed/removed.

I have some friends who keep talking up Facebook with me. The biggest reason for some is the increased ability (vs. Myspace) to enact privacy filters to control who can or cannot access one's account information. 

Facebook is making a splash about this, using sparklines to help users set the exact privacy level they require. A brief article on Mashable gives more detail. 

However, this 2/16/09 Mashable article brings some scary news. Facebook has changed its Terms of Service (TOS) so that now everything you ever write, upload, comment on, etc. belongs to Facebook in perpetuity, regardless of whether you leave Facebook at a later date.

That means words, pictures... whatever.

It's a little unnerving to think that while millions of people are using Facebook to connect with old friends, Facebook is taking ownership of their every word, photo or suggestion for improvement. The TOS are new, and retroactive.

It's not that I think that Facebook is part of some nefarious plot to undermine copyright and artistic control. No, it's not like that at all. It's simply that I think the Internet and social networks are pushing copyright and ownership issues so far past our laws that we are entering a land of remarkable unknowns. There are nothing but questions here... and, of course, lawyers.

Pic Info: "Facebook Knows What You Did Last Summer," From Flickr CC

MToaS 29: Google Tools


I've been using some of the Google tools for a while, and am hooked. I love Google Docs and Reader, and use Docs all the time. It is incredibly convenient both for documents that I am sharing with someone and for documents for personal use that I want to be able to access from multiple locations. It's also very easy to use.

I am very happy to learn about google 411 ~ what a great feature! I don't know how many times I've wished I had a phone book handy when I was out and about. You can be sure that Goog411 is loaded into my cell phone already. Perfect.

The web history stuff was very interesting... I liked the videos about what kinds of information Google collects and what it is used for. 

I do have a sense that Google is trying very hard to keep its information secure, but I worry about the "little guys" who are starting up and don't have as many resources to put toward keeping their sites secure. I remember reading about Twitter being hacked into sometime in the last year or so. I wonder about cross-site security when so many of these sites link to each other through RSS feeds or sharing of information. Does anybody know anything about that... anything scary or reassuring?

Pic Info: "Which Way Now?" from Flickr CC

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Pears and Cheese and Pasta, Oh My!


Last Friday night we got together with friends Nancy, Steph and Jane at Jane's house... we shared a lovely bottle of wine that Jane had given us over the holidays. A 2006 dry Chenin Blanc by Dry Creek vineyards. Excellent and lovely, just the perfect, light fruitiness that I love.

We also had the most excellent dish from my new Bon Appetit cookbook. I bought Fast Easy Fresh a few weeks ago, but then I got a cold and my desire to cook anything more than Tom Yum went right out the window. So, when we spoke with Jane about having a get together, she graciously let me choose what I wanted to cook from the new cookbook and then delegated complementary sides and appetizers for everyone else. This is what good friends do.

It was so great to get together and hang out with these great women. But, I have to say that what is sticking in my head is how much fun it was to talk books with Jane's younger son. He named off his favorites: the Pendragon and Redwall series made the top of the list, and it was so cool for Gabi and me to be able to say that we had read those books too. And we suggested he try the Skullduggery Pleasant books, because they are just exceptionally fun.

I made Linguine with Pears and Gorgonzola Cheese. Wow. I didn't adjust the recipe at all, and it was so good. The flavors are lovely and perfectly balanced, and the light sweetness of the pears plays off perfectly with the cheese ~ which is much more subtle than you might expect, given the strength and general smelliness of gorgonzola. Also, the meal comes together very quickly but has an elegant "feel." Perfect dinner party fare. My friends loved it. We all had seconds. One of them had fourths!

******

Linguine with Pears and Gorgonzola Cheese

from  The Bon Appetit Fast Easy Fresh Cookbook, (c) 2008. By Barbara Fairchild.

1/4 cup (1/2 stick) butter
4 firm pears (about 2 pounds), peeled, cored, cut into 1/3-inch strips
1 tablespoon chopped fresh rosemary
1 cup low-sodium chicken broth
4 ounces Gorgonzola cheese, crumbled (about 1 cup)
3/4 cup freshly grated Parmesan cheese, divided
1/2 cup heavy whipping cream
12 ounces linguine
1/3 cup chopped pecans

Melt butter in heavy large skillet over medium-high heat. Add pears; saute until tender and beginning to brown but not soft, about 8 minutes. Using slotted spoon, carefully transfer pears to bowl. Add rosemary to skillet and stir until fragrant, about 1 minute. Add broth, Gorgonzola cheese, 1/2 cup Parmesan, and cream. Simmer until sauce thickens enough to coat spoon, whisking occasionally, about 6 minutes. Return pears and any accumulated juices to sauce.

Do Ahead: Sauce can be made 2 hours ahead. Let stand at room temperature. Bring to simmer before continuing.

Cook linguine in large pot of boiling salted water until just tender but still firm to bite, stirring occasionally. Drain; return pasta to pot. Add sauce and pecans to pasta; toss over medium-low heat until sauce coats pasta, about 3 minutes. Season to taste with salt and pepper. Transfer to a large bowl. Sprinkle with remaining 1/4 cup Parmesan cheese.

MToaS 28: Netvibes and more

I checked out customized home pages during the first run of 23 Things, and I ended up sticking with my MyYahoo page. It was already created, and gave me all the information I wanted, and  I didn't see any other customized page that would make my Internetting more efficient or interesting. But I went through the customized web page ideas presented for Thing 28: read the articles, watched the clip, checked out PageFlakes and Netvibes.

This is what I think: I've often said that my life would make boring television. Well, I think it makes for boring customized home pages, too.

Ironically, it's my curiosity that causes a certain amount of the boring problem.

When I discovered RSS feeds and Google Reader I was so excited, why, I could sign up for everything that was interesting: NY Times, The Splendid Table, The Daily Beast, The Shifted Librarian... you get the idea. 

Then, the inevitable happened. I got my RSS feeds from all of these sources (and more), and, you know what? I didn't have the time, inclination or attention span to read them. So instead I listened to podcasts of This American Life and Wait Wait Don't Tell Me.

So the same thing happens when I look too long at customizable home pages. There are just too many options. I don't want that much information looking at me the moment I open up my browser. I like segues. I want to mosey from here to there as the time allows ~ or not. 

Which is not to say that I couldn't create a new opening page that gave me the limited options I need first thing. It's just that... well... MyYahoo is doing just fine for the moment, thank you.

That said, I am attempting to create a home page for the Royalton Library with NetVibes. Something for staff use, not patrons. I'm wondering if I can use a customized home page to provide us with easier access to our most-used non-GRRL reference sources. Sort of like bookmarks ~ just easier to see and move through, so more like hyper-bookmarks. I'm still playing with it. I'll let you know how it turns out.

Wednesday, February 4, 2009

MToaS 27: Twitter me story time

, methinks, is for people who really love texting. 

Generally speaking, I am profoundly uninterested in texting. It serves its uses... a friend's father was terminally ill, and we didn't want to disturb the family with phone calls. So text updates were perfect. It was my Nevada nephew's first birthday and my sister sent a "wish you were here" note. Perfect. But generally speaking, I have yet to be convinced that I will be closer to the beloveds in my life by knowing the details of their days in minute detail.

You just can't share a good bottle of Chenin Blanc via texting or twitter. I'd rather be face to face, even if it means we catch up much more rarely.

That said, I did go into Twitter and I "followed" a few libraries, and from a professional perspective I can say that Twitter looks like it could be a great marketing tool. The Kansas City PL used Twitter to announce a rescheduling of an author event, and the Casa Grande Library in Arizona uses Twitter to promote new items in their collection. These both strike me as great uses for Twitter, and I'd love to see GRRL ~ in whole or by branch ~ jump on this bandwagon. 

I like that there are so many avenues for people to connect with Twitter ~ IM, text message, or Internet. 

However, I'm just not sure how well Twitter would work for tiny branches like mine. I serve a community of 1,000 or so people. We do get folks in from other communities, but the bulk of our patrons are from Royalton. Many of them don't have Internet at home (that's why they come to the library). Of those that do have Internet access from home, a significant number of them have dial-up because that is all they can get at their rural addresses. 

I'm not sure how many have cell phones, either, or if they have the phones, whether they are in the "high texting" demographic that Twitter seems created for.

It makes me think of the whole big stimulus package/infrastructure debate going on right now. We really need broadband access everywhere. Not just in cities and large towns. And it's not just so that I could send out story hour notices via Twitter. As more and more social services and employers move to put all their paperwork online, huge swaths of our population are being excluded from the ability to go online to apply for jobs, update their medicare plans, apply for unemployment, etc. I'm not sure that libraries will be able to keep up with the demand when our funding is on the line during the economic downturn. 

Sunday, February 1, 2009

Great Young Adult Fiction

Spoiler alert: You might want to skip this entry if you haven't yet read (but are planning to read) Twilight. I won't give away too much about Hero.

I finally read Twilight by Stephenie Meyer. You know the one: getting rave comparisons to the Harry Potter series, new movie released, has sold a bajillion copies. On Barnes & Noble it has a rating average of 5 stars from 6, 290 readers.

So, there must be something to the story, but I just can't bring myself to recommend it.

This much is true: it's a quick read. There's plenty of suspense. The story line pulls the reader along and you almost can't help but want to know what will happen next.

But...

I think my problem was one of expectations. This book has received such high reviews that I expected something extraordinary when I slipped between these covers. What I found instead is a story that is more cliched than original and a love story that becomes more unsettling and neurotic the more objectively you look at it. Sure Edward is gorgeous ~ we read about his godlike beauty ad-nauseum ~ but the central element of the attraction is both derivative and misogynist: he's the gorgeous bad boy who will either kill the girl or protect her forever.

Another reason I couldn't quite like Twilight: I expected it to be a vampire story.  After all, Edward is a vampire. But really, Twilight is Wuthering Heights in the drippy Pacific Northwest. Instead of class prejudices keeping the young lovers apart it is the problem of Edward getting all sparkly in the sunshine. Instead of social mores keeping them chaste and sexually frustrated, it's the inconvenient fact that if Edward gets too excited his super-human strength might cause him to pop Belle's head like a tomato. 

Sorry for the snark. I really tried to like this story. In fact, for the first half I was hooked: there were all these enticing little leads that I thought might go somewhere, and I couldn't wait to see what Meyer might do with them. But she kept returning to teenage-girl-swoons-for-sexy-bad-boy-and-keeps-secrets-from-her-parents

Ohh-kay.

I wanted to reach through the pages and shake Meyer, "Why is Belle so clumsy?" "Why does she have such chemistry with Edward when no one else has?" "What about this ethical question of a doctor who is a vampire?"

Obviously, none of these questions get answered. In fact, at this point I almost doubt that Meyer knew she had (potentially) raised them.

Still, I can understand why a lot of parents are happy to have their daughters reading Twilight and others in the series (I'm sure most boys gag by page 2). On the surface it seems almost uniquely chaste and sober. There's no sex to speak of, although there are about 50 swoons per chapter. There's no profanity or gore at all. In fact, the climactic fight scene happens "off-stage" so that instead of the climax being about the fight to protect Belle from the bad vampire (as opposed to Edward's lovely family) the climactic scene is Edward's internal struggle to resist the desire to consume Belle after the bad vampire spilled some of her blood. 

However, look deeper and the story becomes so unsettling. Edward has all the power: he's stronger, smarter, calls the shots and makes all the splendid rescues. Belle is more his adored pet than anything approaching an equal. 

This leads me to my biggest disappointment with the book: Belle never develops her strength. She starts the story insecure, timid and weak and she ends the story by walking to her own demise. She might run but she never fights, never tries to outthink the vampire who is set on killing her. No, she just shudders, feels terrified... and faints. 

Of course, at that point Edward and the Cullens arrive to rescue her. Right on cue. 
Contrast that with Thom Creed, the main character in the phenomenal YA fantasy Hero by Perry Moore. Hero is set in a funky alternate reality where Martina Navratilova is a tennis superstar, parents separate and teenage girls get pregnant, and Captain Justice and the League fight villains and keep normal folks safe from harm. 

Thom is a basketball star but that doesn't make him popular with the other high school kids. Thom's quiet, introverted and gay, and his dad, once one of the most famous of superheroes, is a social pariah after a rescue gone tragically awry. Thom's mom has left, so it's just Thom and his dad in a lonely social isolation. Then, strange things begin happening, and Thom comes to realize that he might be a "super" too. 

He discovers this right around the same time that he's outed at a basketball game. In front of his father. And the cute guy he's been practicing with.

In contrast to Twilight, there are lots of big questions in Hero. It's all about issues of identity and loyalty and what truly defines bravery in a world populated by superheroes like Uberman and Warrior Woman. 

Also, there is sex and violence in Hero, as well as some smartly placed F-bombs. None is gratuitous, and frankly the more blatant sexuality in Hero seem both saner and ~ strangely ~ cleaner than the overly-romanticized, swooning, throbbing, never-ending sexual tension of Twilight.

I could go on, but I don't want to spoil it for you. It won't be coming soon to a theater near you, so you'll just have to read it yourself. Trust me, Hero is powerful fiction, the sort of book that inspires readers as well as writers. It left me thinking about its themes for days afterward, recommending it to others, and generally wanting to proselytize the transformative power of stories. It's this kind of book: I finished the last page, closed the book, held it to my chest and said, "Wow."