Summing it up ~ MToaS Evaluation

I'm doing the happy dance now. I know that the deadline for finishing More Things on a Stick was extended into June, but I really wanted to finish by today. And so I did. Yeah me. Now I can go back and play more with some of the things I learned, not to mention returning to a more personal tone with the blog. I'm happy about that, too.

(Just in time for my birthday on Saturday! Forty!! I've been making ice cream. I decided, it's my birthday and if I want homemade ice cream and brownies, then that's what I'll have.) 

So, as for More Things on a Stick:

Again, I find myself wanting to stand on a mountaintop and shout out to fellow library staff: DO IT. I think there is just so much in current web technologies that could be useful to us and our patrons. Again, I am frustrated by the inertia that seems to happen when trying to keep up with something that, by its very nature, changes so much and so often that it cannot really be kept up with. It takes a lot of effort and time to not just learn about these technologies and programs, but also to use them enough to reach enough of a comfort level to use them in the public eye where any typos, mis-uses, and misunderstandings will be out there for everyone from our neighbors to our supervisors to our mothers to see. Eek.

So, I keep hoping that we will reach the tipping point with some of these ideas. At GRRL a few things have really caught on. Ironically, one of the Web 2.0 tools that has crossed the barrier from geek- to general-use is not one that I've seen covered in either 23 Things or More Things. It's SurveyMonkey. In a word, fabulously useful.

Again, I really like the way that the Things program is set up. I like that its designers don't (seem to) have any strict assumptions about what kinds of web tools will be useful for people working in a library setting. So we get to manipulate photos, try our hand at Twitter, learn about on-line money management tools. All of these things will be useful to some participants and useless to others. I like that Things staff throw it all out there and trust participants to decide.

That said, I do think that there was too much emphasis put on Twitter, and I would like to have seen something exploring strengths and weaknesses of alternative search engines, especially Wolfram Alpha. [Okay, that was a joke. Look here or here.]

So, good job. I hope we can do this again next year!

Web Junction (MToaS 46)

I admit, I tend to forget about Web Junction. I signed up for it even before the first 23 Things on a Stick, so I've been a member for a while. But I've actually used it very little. However, when prompted to go back I do find interesting things ~ mostly in the area of courses. I've taken a couple of Web Junction courses online and found them to be pretty good. The webinar on Social Software and the Rural Library looks like an interesting one.

I think, for me, part of the problem with these kinds of discussion boards is simply finding the time to use them. Perhaps it's a matter of making it be part of my day or week ~ create time to do it until it becomes a habit. But so far this has been a hurdle that I haven't quite managed to jump over. Intellectually, I love the idea of having a resource for Minnesota librarians to use to communicate about topics relevant to our work, help us keep abreast of changes in technology, legalities, etc., bring up new ideas about ways to reach and reach out to our communities. I want there to be something exactly like WebJunction. And there is. So why is it so difficult to fit it into my working life?

In a moment of overload I found this ShelfCheck toon by the inimitable Poesygalore. It sort of sums it up.

by poesygalore | Create your own Cartoon at www.toondoo.com

Head in the Clouds (MToaS 45)

After reading some of the recommended readings on cloud computing I did some more research into this brave new world of data collection. It's a fascinating thing.

Yes, I do many things "in the cloud." Google docs, wikis, online banking, etc. etc. It's useful and, generally speaking, for anything you could want to do (ie. write a letter or report) there is someone out there who has figured out an easy way to let you do it, often for free. The hardest part sometimes is simply sifting through all the different kinds of applications, widgets, etc. to figure out which one you want to use.

Oh, and remembering your passwords and usernames.

I also think it's interesting to see how online storage is becoming the new way to think about protecting your valuable information. Create an online library of all your books, DVDs and CDs, upload all your photos, scan and make PDF's of all your important documents and store them in the cloud, and if your house burns down or gets busted up by a tornado then at least you can recover these things. Strange how making something virtual somehow makes it more secure against loss.

Of course, security concerns still linger. What if someone hacks into your data? What if the company you're using suddenly vanishes from the Internet-o-sphere? What if a glitch "out there" affects my ability to create something right here?

In the spirit of the thing, I found a listing by GoGrid CEO John Keagy about the future of cloud computing. GoGrid is one of many companies that are set up not so much for individuals but for companies, with the idea being that the organization uses GoGrid for information storage instead of worrying about servers and on-site storage (what happens, I wonder, to IT departments then? Do they get smaller or larger with cloud storage?). Regardless, without further ado, ten predictions for cloud computing in 2009:

1. Asking “is the Enterprise ready for the Cloud” will be analogized to “the Internet is a fad”
2. There will be some Cloud security breaches that will become super high profile
3. Questioning the security of the Cloud will become less vogue
4. The demand on companies to develop Cloud strategies will be likened to Y2K certification
5. Cloud strategies will be proven to be more important than Y2K certification
6. SAN storage will not emerge as being relevant to Cloud Computing
7. NoHardware.com will illuminate the spirit of the Cloud movement
8. RackSpace stock will claw back to $10.00
9. Al Gore will announce he invented Cloud Computing
10. Cloud Computing will (fill in the blank, for example, ...be the silver bullet to slow or stop the recession? ...enable companies to maintain profitability? ...bring government into the 21st century?)

I think it's interesting, cool, and could be a real boon to libraries, both in terms of productivity with wikis, GoogleDocs, etc., and in the archival sense of scanning and saving books, art, oral histories, etc.

Brave new world and a little CYA for the old one. Could be an all-around good thing.

***

Pic credits: Image: 'Sunny Side Up' www.flickr.com/photos/74122471@N00/233472093

Cloud Computing

by chezbrandi | Create your own Cartoon at www.toondoo.com

Money Tools (MToaS 44)

This Thing could not have come at a better time. As of yesterday, I am no longer the treasurer for St. Cloud OUT, a small community group that, among other things, puts on a GLBTA Film Festival every year. As I was thinking about how best to hand over the checkbook after four years as treasurer, I was stumped. I had the checkbook information on Quicken, but what if the next treasurer doesn't have access to the program? How best to handle the transfer of checkbook and responsibilities?

When I came on board as treasurer four years ago, the books were a mess. Yes, all the records had been kept, but messily so. It took me a couple of months to figure out what was what, and even then there were a couple of things that I looked at, pondered, and finally gave up on. What I want, as someone who's put years into a small, sometimes fragile, very worthwhile community organization, is a way to make leadership transitions smooth and provide the checks and balances to make sure that the funds are being handled properly.

Mint.com and ClearCheckbook both look like reasonable ways to answer this question. My concern with Mint.com is that our bank is not included in their on-line service (ReadWriteWeb complains that only large banks are included, and why is that when this could be such a boon to smaller banks?). I couldn't find a way to manually upload information, but perhaps I'll look again. What I like about Mint.com, if the bank is included, is that (from the sounds of it) transaction information is automatically uploaded and e-mailed out to one or two accounts. No one needs to find the time to manually do the job - and we all know how hard it is go get to those "little" jobs, especially when it's a volunteer duty and not our real work.

This sounds like such a good idea for community groups and non-profits. In my experience, few of us have treasurers with professional accounting experience. Greater transparency and checks and balances (ie. the account transaction e-mails go to both Treasurer and Chair) would only help the fiscal health of the organization.

Makes me want to stand on a mountaintop and shout it out to all FOL groups. Makes me want to change banks so that we can use Mint.com.

ClearCheckbook also looks like a useful option. You don't have to rely on the bank being part of their system, you can manually upload information (although, when I tried uploading my Quicken file it turned all the dates since Feb. 2002 to Jan. 1, 1970. That was aggravating!). Again, lots of options. I have a meeting scheduled Monday to sit down with the new Treasurer and Chair, and I plan to show them both Mint and ClearCheckbook and recommend that we go with one or the other.

As to the other links on this Thing: some more useful than others, of course. It was nice to find out that I was correct about which gas stations had the lowest prices in our area. I loved MadCity Chickens (love those Madison folks!). Made me wistful. I grew up on a small hobby farm with lots of chickens, goats, horses, etc. I love the big brown hens, and have often thought it would be fun to have a few (even if I can't eat the eggs). They're just such pleasant and silly creatures (the hens, roosters are awful!). I must admit tho, the Eglu pic above made me laugh out loud! Smart, inventive, but all I could think when I saw it was, "Yeah, that'd be the home of yuppy chickens!!"

***

Speaking of the economy and chickens... I couldn't stop myself from looking at the price of the Eglu that's pictured at the top. $995. Holds "up to" 10 chickens. Oh my, oh my. That is not the hobby farm I grew up on!!

Online TV and Video

I adore Hulu, and have been using it since I discovered it during 23 Things on a Stick. I admit that I most appreciate it when I'm sick ~ I curl up in bed with my itty-bitty laptop snuggled under the covers with me and watch sci-fi channel re-runs. It's great. I also know some people who have cut costs by dropping their cable and now catch all their TV online. It makes sense.

In fact, I watch a lot of TV online. If I miss an episode of one of my favorite programs ~ because of a TiVo glitch or because I didn't discover it in time to add to TiVo ~ I go online to find the episode.

It's been interesting to see how TV networks are adjusting to this trend. They make money by selling the full season DVD's, so I'm seeing more and more shows where the episodes are only available on Hulu for a limited time. After that, you need to catch it on re-runs ... or hope that your local library forks over the money for the DVD.

I haven't taken part in the video sharing opportunities, although that might be more interesting to me if I had a Facebook or similar account. I don't. I can't bring myself to want to, even if I can see how it would be interesting to hook into groups with similar interests to make new discoveries. In spite of this, I don't feel left out. I have friends who don't watch TV at all, yet they're bright, articulate, interesting and informed. Imagine it.

Another thing of note: a recent Time magazine article about The Mentalist described it as so old fashioned (it has definite nods to Columbo) that you couldn't even watch episodes online. The only way to see Jane catch the bad guys is to watch it on television. However, CBS execs aren't completely ignoring the Internet-TV phenomenon ~ you can watch teasers/trailers online!

Music and More (MToaS 42)

I love the opportunities for discovering music online. I've been a huge fan of Pandora for a while, and am getting to know Last.fm thanks to the MToaS prompting. There are some things I really like about both programs.

Pandora is great about bringing forward artists who have not found wide release, and I find the program easier and more intuitive than last.fm. However, Pandora playlists have a tendency to "bleed" into each other. I have very eclectic music tastes, but that doesn't mean I like to listen to everything all together. I like Counting Crows and Katie Melua equally, but I don't want them playing one after the other. 

A couple of days' sampling suggests that last.fm does a better job of keeping distinct voices separate.

By the same token, Pandora seems to recommend based on the sound of a piece much more than the genre that the artist is identified with. Last.fm seems to group more by genre. I guess it depends on which way of grouping a listener prefers.

What I love about both is the ability to discover new artists, voices, sounds. I've discovered lots of great songs through Pandora. I expect I will with last.fm. 

I do really like that last.fm gives me information like artist bio, tour dates, etc., and that I can play an artist's song on demand.

As for Internet radio, I love it, and have enjoyed it for a while. I really like WFUV out of New York and Live Ireland out of Dublin. Both have great songlists. My favorite source for finding new Internet radio stations is actually the easiest: iTunes. It's all built right into the iMac system and couldn't be easier (same is true for subscribing to podcasts, another thing I love about iTunes).

Mashup your life (MToaS 41)

I've been trying out lifestream.fm for a few days now. I can see where it would be useful to folks who are linked in to social networks like Twitter, Facebook, etc, as well as using Delicious on a regular basis. For me, I ended up with a listing of the music I listened to on Last.fm and my Blogger posts. 

What was interesting was scrolling over the over 60 program icons linked up to Lifestream. Even worse, I recognized less than a quarter of them. Now, just when I'm starting to feel exhausted and ready to be done with MToaS, I'm introduced to a new system that leads me to ask, "What the heck is Mister Wong?"

I do, however, see more usability for Lifestream for those who are plugged into the social aspects of the web ~ and me, I keep looking for the productivity. I doubt that I'll continue with Lifestream after I finish with MToaS. 

What I will do is go figure out what Mister Wong is. And Plazes. And Qik. And...

Knock out Gnocchi

Jane and Nancy came over for dinner last night and I made this fabulous gnocchi dish that I found in EatingWell Magazine. I couldn't find my actual magazine, but fortunately I did find the recipe on-line. I made a couple of adjustments (added sun-dried tomatoes, used unseasoned tomatoes and added my own basil and oregano seasoning). It's great. I was told that it should be in next year's cookbook ~ in the meantime, I'll put it here.

This is such a great recipe: it is very easy to cook (even after a couple of glasses of wine), goes down like true comfort food, and after the prep work is done it comes together very quickly. I prepped everything ahead of time and then, after appetizers were finished, cooked the dish while Jane, Nancy and Gabi hung out with me in the kitchen, laughing, drinking wine and telling stories. It was a lovely evening.

A few small points to make about the recipe (especially after reading the comments left on the site): First, be sure to use shelf-stable gnocchi, not dried or frozen. Shelf-stable means that it comes in a plastic vacuum pack and isn't dried. This is important.

Secondly, the original recipe suggests that you could use spinach in place of the chard. I haven't tried it, but my instinct would recommend against it. Spinach is too mild and breaks down too much when cooked, and you need something with enough flavor and substance to stand up to the rest of the ingredients, in both flavor and texture. 

Which brings me to the cheese: if you can, I'd highly recommend using good Parmesan that you grate yourself. I've made it with pre-grated cheese ~ and "better quality" cheese in the refrigerated section at that ~ but the flavor loss shows. A few of the reviews on the web site criticized the recipe for having a bland flavor. Boxed and/or pre-shredded Parmesan cheese, spinach, or frozen/dried gnocchi that has to be parboiled before skillet frying will all contribute blandness instead of flavor. 

Skillet Gnocchi with Chard & White Beans

From EatingWell Magazine, Jan/Feb 2009

1 tablespoon plus 1 teaspoon oil from oil-packed sun dried tomatoes

1 16-ounce package shelf-stable gnocchi

1 medium yellow onion, thinly sliced

4 cloves garlic, minced

4-5 sliced oil-packed sun-dried tomatoes, diced

1/2 cup water

6 cups cleaned, chopped chard leaves (about 1 small bunch)

1 15-ounce can petite-diced tomatoes, juice included

1 15-ounce can white beans, rinsed

2 teaspoons dried basil

1 teaspoon dried oregano

1/4- 1/2 teaspoon freshly ground black pepper

pinch red pepper flakes (optional)

1/2 cup shredded part-skim mozzarella cheese

1/4 cup finely shredded Parmesan cheese

1. Heat 1 tablespoon oil in a large nonstick skillet over medium heat. Add gnocchi and cook, stirring often, until plumped and starting to brown, 5-7 minutes. Transfer to a bowl.

2. Add the remaining 1 teaspoon oil and the onion to the pan and cook, stirring, over medium heat, for 2 minutes. Stir in the garlic, sun dried tomatoes, and water. Cover and cook until the onion is soft, 4 to 6 minutes. Add chard and cook, stirring, until starting to wilt, 1-2 minutes. Stir in tomatoes, beans, basil, oregano and pepper, and bring to a simmer. Stir in the gnocchi and sprinkle with cheeses. Cover and cook until the cheese is melted and the sauce is bubbling, about 3 minutes.

***

Pic credits: I did not take the above pic (although my dish did turn out just this pretty. The pic is from the EatingWell web site.

Mashup the Web (MToaS 40)

Okay, not sure I'll ever use this again, but Polyvore was interesting. Sort of like putting together a wishlist, except more immediately gratifying.

I looked at Pandora.FM, signed up and all, but it didn't have some of my favorite artists (Over the Rhine and Wailin' Jennys were no-shows, but it did have Hem). Also investigated Lunchbox and Wheel of Food, the latter especially is just silly fun. It seems that Lunchbox only adds restaurants with reviews, so their selection (at least for St. Cloud) was limited. Still interesting. Definitely makes me think that if I owned a restaurant (or other small business) I'd be looking for these kinds of mashups as alternative advertising opportunities. Is there a mashup for "cheap family entertainment" to which libraries could be added? I tried to find one, but didn't (admittedly, I'm running on caffeine right now... and sputtering a little, too.)

I tried Visual Headlines, but it took forever to load and I got bored...

Another odd one: Let Me Google That For You. Not sure what the purpose of that is, but, again, interesting. Crime Reports was frustrating because there are so few cities included.

So, in the end, I spent a little time playing with Polyvore. It was super easy and fun. I can so easily imagine my niece and at least a couple of my nephews (the fifteen and thirteen year olds, especially) having way too much fun making visual wishlists with this one. I was happy to see how easy it was to customize Polyvore and add my own objects of interest... their overly fashionista selection wasn't grabbing my interest.

I've just thought of another idea for Polyvore: lately I've been periodically yearning for a dog. Perhaps to dissuade me from that I should make a collage of all the plunder I'd need to buy if we did get Mia (my lovely Gabi said, so innocently, "Let's just go to the Humane Society and take a look," and like a fool I said, "Okay."). It would be a reality check!

Really Good Cookies

Tomorrow is the annual Bake & Book Sale for the Royalton Friends of the Library. Our friends are the best ~ few but feisty! ~ and provide funds every year for the prize books, craft supplies, and other things we need for the Summer Reading Program. Don't know what we'd do without them.

For the bake sale, I'm making the Giant Chocolate Sugar Cookies from Martha Stewart's Cookies, (c) 2008.  A mere test-drive with the library copy was not enough to satisfy me, so I purchased the book a couple of weeks ago. There are many recipes that look frankly amazing, but this is the only one I've tried so far. I made these cookies last week for a get-together at Jane's house. Had a few technical difficulties (the result of distraction on my part, not glitches in the recipe), but the cookies that cooked properly were really, really good. I'm thinking they'll be a great addition for the bake sale.

Giant Chocolate Sugar Cookies

From the cookbook description: "These oversize sweets don't need any mix-ins or frostings ~ their bold chocolate flavor says it all. In addition to butter, this recipe calls for melted vegetable shortening, which produces an unbeatable texture." I would add this: the cookies have a much more intense flavor after cooking than before. The dough is a little bland; the cookies brilliant. 

1 1/2 cups all-purpose flour

1/2 cup unsweetened Dutch-process cocoa powder

1 teaspoon baking powder

1/2 teaspoon salt

1/2 cup (1 stick) unsalted butter, room temperature

1 1/2 cups sugar

1/2 cup vegetable shortening (or 1/2 cup unsalted butter) melted and cooled

1 large egg

1 1/2 teaspoons pure vanilla extract

1. Preheat oven to 375 degree F. Whisk together flour, cocoa powder, baking powder and salt in a bowl. 

2. Put butter and sugar into the bowl of an electric mixer fitted with the paddle attachment. Mix on medium-high speed until pale and fluffy. Mix in melted shortening (or butter). Add egg and vanilla; mix until creamy. Reduce speed to low. Gradually add flour mixture, and mix until just combined.

3. Using a 2 1/2-inch ice cream scoop, drop dough onto baking sheets lined with parchment paper, spacing about 4 inches apart. Bake until edges are firm, 18 to 20 minutes. Let cool on sheets on wire racks. Cookies can be stored in an airtight container at room temperature up to 2 days.

Digital Storytelling (MToaS 39)

Another fun one. I can definitely see how this would be applicable to library work. I loved the history pages about Laura Wilson on escrapbooking. What a great way to make history come alive and feel accessible to kids! Hooray! 

Just yesterday I was talking with my supervisor about how exciting the non-fiction publishing world is right now. More and more, non-fiction writers are jumping clear of the restraints of academia and bringing the layperson fun, intriguing, exasperating, amazing and generally fantastic stories about what has brought us ~ as people, communities, societies ~ to this crazy place we are today. I think these tools (MToaS 38, 39, etc) can be part of that trend. Very, very cool.

For many of us, I suspect that the biggest obstacle to embracing these tools in the workplace will be getting our respective organizations ~ schools, public and private libraries, etc. ~ on board. It's not as simple as getting a great idea about how we, as individuals with a techy-geeky bent (okay, maybe I'm just speaking for myself) could utilize Web 2.0 tools to advertise/celebrate programs and the work we're doing, it's also a matter of having our respective administrations jump on board and say "Yes! Go for it!" Even if they want to encourage us, there may be a whole gamut of obstacles that need to be overcome first, as well as issues of politics/funding/staffing/etc. that may take priority for their attention.

I ended up using Scrapblog [note: the link on MToaS page doesn't work]. It was ridiculously easy to figure out. I used a video that I made a while ago on my sweet iMac. It was already uploaded on YouTube, so a very simple matter to go grab it, add some funness and then easy-peasy posting onto Blogger. The way these tools are integrating makes it very easy to manipulate data of whatever format and spend the precious brain cells on creativity rather than figuring out the logistics of specific programs. Nice.

***

Oh, and lastly: I'm really enjoying Skitch. (My apologies to the Windows users out there.) I took a pic of a robin who's built a nest on the gutters just outside our porch window. She's gotten used to us gazing at her. Doesn't even do more than glare when Rosie starts chattering at her. (We do pull a curtain across the window to give her more privacy.) We can't wait to see the little robin-lings that will hopefully be coming.

Scrapblog sample

Screencasting (MToaS 38)

Okay, I think I've found the MToaS equivalent to GoogleDocs. I love screencasting. Bit of a learning curve here: the screencast below doesn't look as good on YouTube as it did on ScreenCast, so I need to rethink the screen size. Other than that (and my messy narration) I'm pleased with it. 

I've done three or four training Power Points for work as part of different GRRL teams. Screencasts could be a great addition to those.

Also, I really like Skitch. Too bad it's Mac only. It is so much easier to use than the Windows-based print-screen command. I spent hours doing screen shots for the power point I made for our Internet for Seniors training... Skitch would have cut that time considerably. 

The obvious problem, however, is the Mac vs. PC thing.

Regardless, thanks MToaS folks. These are great tools!

New DVDs @ GRRL

Playing with Pics (MToaS 37)

First, true confession: I'm the one who brings a camera along to a birthday party, leaves it in the car, and then, when the party is over, as I'm heaving my tired self into the driver's seat (purse, keys, water bottle, over shirt and ball cap spilling out of my hands) spontaneously shouts out "dammit!" when I see the camera case on the floor by the back seat.

In other words, I don't have many pics that I would want to upload onto Flickr, on the off chance that someone might actually look.

My sister Sherri is a brilliant photographer. She's sent us pics of her sons (I have the cutest nephews known to aunti-kind), panoramas of the high plains where she lives, close-ups of flowers and bees... all gorgeous shots. She's really an artist. Me, not so much. I'm more pragmatic than gifted when it comes to photos.

That said, it was fun to mosey around these picture sites. My Animoto experiment is below (the nicest thing about it might have been the ease with which it uploaded into Blogger). I did make a photo collage using Collagr (and some garden pics I uploaded last year for 23 Things). But, you know, it just really wasn't that interesting.

I did use Tiltshift to make the top pic of my cat Rosie a tad more interesting. I also used roflbot to create the captions. (I tried to use CaptionBubble but it wouldn't work for me. I'm wondering if there is a Mac vs. PC issue?)

So, all cool stuff. But I can't help wondering about the limitations.

We had a staff meeting today and learned that there are very stringent copyright rules for the Summer Reading Program graphics, wording, etc. So can we use these tools with any of them? I'd guess no.

We also have new branch pages for the GRRL web site (great new site) but I'm not sure whether we'll be able to add pictures or java script to our pages.

My lovely Gabi is a teacher, and I share many of these tools with her. But she's discovered that she can't use many of them for teaching because she can't access them from school. The school district has set such stringent limits on types of websites that can be accessed from school computers ~ including teacher's computers ~ that many of these great tools are little more than fun/cool/pretty things to think about.

That said, I do see lots of opportunities here. Just got to muddle a little more about how to actually put them to use.

Animoto Experiment

Generating Some Fun (MToaS 36)

 

I love the poem by ee cummings, In Just Spring, and so I used the Wordle image generator to make a wordle of the poem. Very fun. These are silly things, but they are rewarding and entertaining too. For one thing, each of us who writes these blogs is hoping that someone else will read them. Adding wee bits of entertainment can help.

If we write blogs for our libraries, or have branch home pages (as GRRL will very soon!) these might be fun things to add as well. So while they are silly on the one hand, I think they can be useful as well. 

I've also thought these would be great fun for publicizing and promoting programs. I love the idea of making READ posters with library staff, community members, etc. Also, the newspaper article generator was great fun, as was the dictionary entry generator. I can think of many ways that we could use these tools to make our programs, blogs, web pages, etc. much more entertaining, and therefore to generate more interest in what we're doing.

I tried making the comics. Made one on MakebeliefsComix that I liked well enough,  but couldn't export it. Then I remade it on ToonDoo. First I used the regular embedding and couldn't figure out how to resize it to make it fit the screen. The second time, I embedded as Flash code and that worked better. So, fun, but more cumbersome than I would have expected. All the same, it is very gratifying for me to see my story made visual!

***

Update (an hour later): Made another comic; it went faster/better. Also, stumbled upon the comics by poesygalore do check her out! Her stuff is too funny!

by chezbrandi | Create your own Cartoon at www.toondoo.com